I googled this and found a lot of pictures. Whether these pictures really represent this technique I do not know, gonna assume they do since it is King Aurther. What I cant understand is the differences? To me there is not a lot of difference between the 4. The only difference I see is that #1 has more pockets together.
Photo curtesy of King Arthur flour.
With all that extra effort to incorporate the starter properly after the autolyse, I'm a bit disappointed to see so little bang for my buck. The loaves that include an autolyse (#3 and #4) do show greater expansion, but there's not a dramatic difference.
Dough #1: The mix that received no autolyse or pause produces a slightly smaller baguette, with a more erratic crumb structure than the other test loaves.
Dough #2: The mix and pause method produces the best color, crumb, and scoring.
Dough #3: The 30-minute autolyse yields a robust loaf with a decent crumb, but nothing to write home about.
Dough #4: The 60-minute autolyse produces the largest baguette, but the crumb isn't as open as #1, #2 or #3.
Results curtesy of
AUTHOR
Barb Alpern
However you will get a better results if you include an autolyse